• Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
CloudAve
Software in Business. The Business of Software.
  • Business
    • Analysis
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Marketing
    • Strategy
    • Small business
  • Technology
    • Application Software
    • Infrastructure
    • Open Source
    • Mobile
    • Platforms
    • Product reviews
    • Security
  • Misc
    • Design
    • Just for fun
    • Trends & Concepts
  • Sponsors
Browse: Home / The Exclusion that is a Community

The Exclusion that is a Community

By Eric Norlin on November 2, 2009

A caveat on this post: I hesitated to write this – mostly because I think it’s very easy for the author (me) to cross a line of being provocative for provocative-ness’ sake, and for readers/commenters (you) to misinterpret my meaning here. Please be gentle.

There were a few tweets flying around at JiveWorld last week about how social software is all about “inclusion.” I want to push back on that a bit. Mostly, because I think social software, insofar as it’s about community formation has, as it’s first act (and I’ll explain this a bit), *exclusion*.

I think it’s pretty commonly accepted in sociological circles that “communities” (ie, groups) form via an act of exclusion. That is to say that all groups define “us” as against something else (”them”) by necessity. Even in the case where a “group” tries to explicitly eschew this implicit act of exclusion, the very act of doing so (saying “we are defined by NOT being exclusionary”) is an exclusionary act.

This, of course, leaves a bit of a bad taste in people’s collective mouths. And rightfully so. None of us *wants* to be exclusionary, as our collective histories include so many atrocities and bad acts based upon severe acts of exclusion.

That said, when I heard the “social software is an inclusionary act” meme surface, my gut revolted. And for a reason. It’s simply not true. The first defining act of community is, by definition, exclusionary. This is not to say that communities can’t be “open,” only that there’s always a “them” for our “us.”

So, the next time you hear “social software” – remember, “social” often means community, and community necessarily operates via mechanisms of exclusion.

The same holds true of conferences. Conferences are exclusionary vehicles. Even unconferences – much as they’d like to be inclusionary are exclusionary (just by nature of the fact that some people aren’t there). Attendees at conferences implicitly form a community. In fact, some conferences are so conspicuous in their exclusionary practices as to be “off the record” and “invite only” (The Lobby, for instance). And the highest end tech conferences have an air of real exclusion (D and the Web2.0 Summit come to mind).

So, my friends, won’t you join our community? Everyone is welcome, but if you don’t attend, you really won’t be part of the community.

(Cross-posted @ Defrag)

Posted in General | Tagged community, conferences, defragcon, exclusion, inclusion, jiveworld, Unconference

Eric Norlin

« Previous Next »
feed mail facebook twitter linkedin
  • Tags
  • Calendar
  • Comments

accy2 amazon android Apple aws briefs cloud cloud computing collaboration conferences defragcon Enterprise enterprise 2.0 Entrepreneurship facebook google humor iaas IBM innovation insights integration ipad iphone marketing microsoft netsuite open source paas saas salesforce.com sap Security smb Social Business Social CRM social media Start-up Advice Startup Advice startups Tech Market Analysis twitter vc funding venture capital xero

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
  • Jennifer Bulotti: LinkSource’s IronTrap™ offers...
  • Adron: I’ve been in this industry a solid...
  • Krishnan Subramanian: Well, I am open to...
  • Mathew Lodge: Thanks for the clarification. You...
  • Krishnan Subramanian: Mathew, Thanks for your...
  • Mathew Lodge: Krish, I run the vCloud team at...
  • Krishnan Subramanian: It doesn’t have any...
  • Clark Updike: Can you elaborate on the tie-in...
  • Owen: Guess I’m more cynical than that....
  • Krishnan Subramanian: Thatz exactly what I told...
  • Aswath Rao: Scoble is misframing his arguments...
  • Krishnan Subramanian: I never said DevOps goes...
  • Adron: I’m late on this article…...
  • Chirag Mehta: I agree that iMessage exists, but...
  • Can OpenSocial Be Resurrected In The Enterprise?: ...

Sponsored Content

Introducing Zoho Support Express Plans complemented with a brand New UI
Introducing Zoho Support Express Plans complemented with a brand New UI
Cloud Computing Beyond the Enterprise: Livecasting the Consumer Cloud
Cloud Computing Beyond the Enterprise: Livecasting the Consumer Cloud
Digital Nibbles: The Consumer Cloud & HighTechDad - That’s a Wrap!
Digital Nibbles: The Consumer Cloud & HighTechDad - That’s a Wrap!
HR Technology Prediction for 2012: Year of the Tablet
HR Technology Prediction for 2012: Year of the Tablet
Zoho Books says ‘Don’t fret while paying multiple bills’
Zoho Books says ‘Don’t fret while paying multiple bills’
Why Finance Gets Strategic HR
Why Finance Gets Strategic HR

Archives

Authors

  • Adron Hall
  • Ben Kepes
  • Chirag Mehta
  • Chris Yeh
  • Christian Reilly
  • Dan Morrill
  • Dave Michels
  • David Terrar
  • Hutch Carpenter
  • Jacob Morgan
  • Jarret Pazahanick
  • Joel York
  • John Taschek
  • Krishnan Subramanian
  • Maksim Ovsyannikov
  • Mark Fidelman
  • Mark Suster
  • Martijn Linssen
  • Paul Miller
  • Raju Vegesna
  • Randy Bias
  • Sadagopan
  • Zoli Erdos

  Sponsored by Intel,  Workday and Zoho