• Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
CloudAve
Software in Business. The Business of Software.
  • Business
    • Analysis
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Marketing
    • Strategy
    • Small business
  • Technology
    • Application Software
    • Infrastructure
    • Open Source
    • Mobile
    • Platforms
    • Product reviews
    • Security
  • Misc
    • Design
    • Just for fun
    • Trends & Concepts
  • Sponsors
Browse: Home / The Exclusion that is a Community

The Exclusion that is a Community

By Eric Norlin on November 2, 2009

A caveat on this post: I hesitated to write this – mostly because I think it’s very easy for the author (me) to cross a line of being provocative for provocative-ness’ sake, and for readers/commenters (you) to misinterpret my meaning here. Please be gentle.

There were a few tweets flying around at JiveWorld last week about how social software is all about “inclusion.” I want to push back on that a bit. Mostly, because I think social software, insofar as it’s about community formation has, as it’s first act (and I’ll explain this a bit), *exclusion*.

I think it’s pretty commonly accepted in sociological circles that “communities” (ie, groups) form via an act of exclusion. That is to say that all groups define “us” as against something else (”them”) by necessity. Even in the case where a “group” tries to explicitly eschew this implicit act of exclusion, the very act of doing so (saying “we are defined by NOT being exclusionary”) is an exclusionary act.

This, of course, leaves a bit of a bad taste in people’s collective mouths. And rightfully so. None of us *wants* to be exclusionary, as our collective histories include so many atrocities and bad acts based upon severe acts of exclusion.

That said, when I heard the “social software is an inclusionary act” meme surface, my gut revolted. And for a reason. It’s simply not true. The first defining act of community is, by definition, exclusionary. This is not to say that communities can’t be “open,” only that there’s always a “them” for our “us.”

So, the next time you hear “social software” – remember, “social” often means community, and community necessarily operates via mechanisms of exclusion.

The same holds true of conferences. Conferences are exclusionary vehicles. Even unconferences – much as they’d like to be inclusionary are exclusionary (just by nature of the fact that some people aren’t there). Attendees at conferences implicitly form a community. In fact, some conferences are so conspicuous in their exclusionary practices as to be “off the record” and “invite only” (The Lobby, for instance). And the highest end tech conferences have an air of real exclusion (D and the Web2.0 Summit come to mind).

So, my friends, won’t you join our community? Everyone is welcome, but if you don’t attend, you really won’t be part of the community.

(Cross-posted @ Defrag)

Share:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +1
  • StumbleUpon

Posted in General | Tagged community, conferences, defragcon, exclusion, inclusion, jiveworld, Unconference

Eric Norlin

« Previous Next »
feed mail facebook twitter linkedin

Sponsor Posts

HR Tech Vendors: Who’s Out There?
HR Tech Vendors: Who’s Out There?
The Next Revolution for Finance -- Embedded Analytics
The Next Revolution for Finance -- Embedded Analytics
5 Reasons Why Sales Reps Should Care About Content Marketing
5 Reasons Why Sales Reps Should Care About Content Marketing
5 Voicemail Tactics That Will Get You More Callbacks
5 Voicemail Tactics That Will Get You More Callbacks
  • Tags
  • Calendar
  • Comments

accy2 amazon android Apple aws briefs cloud cloud computing collaboration conferences Enterprise enterprise 2.0 Entrepreneurship facebook google humor iaas IBM innovation insights integration ipad iphone marketing microsoft netsuite open source openstack paas platform services saas salesforce.com sap Security Social Business social media software as a service Startup Advice startups Tech Market Analysis twitter vc funding venture capital vmware xero

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
  • Frank: In the ninties when I transitioned from...
  • Jarret Pazahanick: Thanks for the comment...
  • Hiks: Thanks Jarret. It’s really a very...
  • Vijay: Good Article… I have been working...
  • jarretpazahanick: Thanks Joost for the kind...
  • joost van assen: That is very good information...
  • jarretpazahanick: Volker – Here is a...
  • Chal: Hi Jarret, Could you please advise on how...
  • Volker Kuecherer: Do you have any information...
  • Experiencia Cloud (BETA): What Makes Cloud...
  • Abhishek: I see nothing wrong with rewarding...
  • CloudAve: always insightful Mark Suster...
  • fred zimny's serve4impact: See on...
  • CloudAve: 5 Key Essentials of Cloud Workloads...
  • jasonlkn: It’s natural … especially...

Archives

Authors

  • Adron Hall
  • Ben Kepes
  • Chirag Mehta
  • Chris Yeh
  • Christian Reilly
  • Colin Berkshire
  • Dan Morrill
  • Dan Pepper
  • Dave Michels
  • Dave Roberts
  • Hutch Carpenter
  • Jacob Morgan
  • Jarret Pazahanick
  • Jason M. Lemkin
  • Jeffrey Vocell
  • Joel York
  • John Taschek
  • Krishnan Subramanian
  • Mark Fidelman
  • Mark Suster
  • Martijn Linssen
  • Michael Krigsman
  • Ofir Nachmani
  • Paul Miller
  • Quinton Wall
  • Rakesh Malhotra
  • Randy Bias
  • Sadagopan
  • Scott Bils
  • Zoli Erdos
Sponsored by: