• Home
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
CloudAve
Software in Business. The Business of Software.
  • Business
    • Analysis
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Marketing
    • Strategy
    • Small business
  • Technology
    • Application Software
    • Infrastructure
    • Open Source
    • Mobile
    • Platforms
    • Product reviews
    • Security
  • Misc
    • Design
    • Just for fun
    • Trends & Concepts
  • Sponsors
Browse: Home / One Surefire Way to Screw up Your Lifestyle Business

One Surefire Way to Screw up Your Lifestyle Business

By Derek Pilling on September 2, 2011

Image credit: GigaOM

Some businesses are designed – maybe even destined – to be owner operated. Industry parlance often refers to these businesses as lifestyle businesses. Wikipedia has a nice definition. They are typically small, profitable, generate cash and enable their owner-operator to sustain a well-above average lifestyle. In some circumstances, they may even make their owner-operator filthy rich over time.

Some people  may think that the term lifestyle business is an insult. I couldn’t disagree more. Being the owner-operator of a lifestyle business should be a source of pride; a badge of honor.

As a growth stage investor, I see quite a few lifestyle businesses in our deal log. This type of opportunity finds us because they often meet our high-level screening criteria. They have paying customers, generate meaningful revenue and produce EBITDA and cash every year. They “fit the profile”.

But when I meet with an entrepreneur who is running a lifestyle business, I’m not shy about asking a most important question. It usually goes something like this:

I understand you wish to raise capital to grow your business. But if I’m hearing you correctly, today you own and control nearly 100% of your company. This enables you to lead a balanced life, generate meaningful personal wealth and take great satisfaction from your work. Why would you want to screw all of that up by raising capital?

I mean it too. Raising capital comes with loss of control, changes in lifestyle (read work flexibility) and other issues. More importantly, lifestyle businesses tend to lack one key ingredient that institutional equity investors (particularly growth equity investors) need to generate returns; rapid scalability. Bringing in institutional capital creates an incredible amount of pressure to generate top-line growth. In the context of most lifestyle businesses, that kind of top-line growth is either not achievable or if it is, will so fundamentally alter the character of the business that it will be unrecognizable to the entrepreneur at the end of the process. In short, that pressure will probably do more damage than good from the owner-operators point of view.

So if you are an entrepreneur seeking capital from me and I say something like “You own a great lifestyle business; why on earth would you want to raise capital and screw it up?”, please know I’m coming from an honest place. I’m not insulting you.  I am, however, trying to get you to come to grips with the fact that raising capital may be a surefire way to screw up the good thing you have going.

Share:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Google +1
  • StumbleUpon

(Cross-posted @ Non-Linear Growth)

Posted in Entrepreneurship | Tagged Entrepreneur, Growth Equity, Investment Selection, Investor, lessons learned, lifestyle business, Raising Capital

Derek Pilling

« Previous Next »
feed mail facebook twitter linkedin

Sponsor Posts

5 Reasons Why Sales Reps Should Care About Content Marketing
5 Reasons Why Sales Reps Should Care About Content Marketing
The Next Revolution for Finance -- Embedded Analytics
The Next Revolution for Finance -- Embedded Analytics
HR Tech Vendors: Who’s Out There?
HR Tech Vendors: Who’s Out There?
5 Voicemail Tactics That Will Get You More Callbacks
5 Voicemail Tactics That Will Get You More Callbacks
  • Tags
  • Calendar
  • Comments

accy2 amazon android Apple aws briefs cloud cloud computing collaboration conferences Enterprise enterprise 2.0 Entrepreneurship facebook google humor iaas IBM innovation insights integration ipad iphone marketing microsoft netsuite open source openstack paas platform services saas salesforce.com sap Security Social Business social media software as a service Startup Advice startups Tech Market Analysis twitter vc funding venture capital vmware xero

May 2013
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
  • Frank: In the ninties when I transitioned from...
  • Jarret Pazahanick: Thanks for the comment...
  • Hiks: Thanks Jarret. It’s really a very...
  • Vijay: Good Article… I have been working...
  • jarretpazahanick: Thanks Joost for the kind...
  • joost van assen: That is very good information...
  • jarretpazahanick: Volker – Here is a...
  • Chal: Hi Jarret, Could you please advise on how...
  • Volker Kuecherer: Do you have any information...
  • Experiencia Cloud (BETA): What Makes Cloud...
  • Abhishek: I see nothing wrong with rewarding...
  • CloudAve: always insightful Mark Suster...
  • fred zimny's serve4impact: See on...
  • CloudAve: 5 Key Essentials of Cloud Workloads...
  • jasonlkn: It’s natural … especially...

Archives

Authors

  • Adron Hall
  • Ben Kepes
  • Chirag Mehta
  • Chris Yeh
  • Christian Reilly
  • Colin Berkshire
  • Dan Morrill
  • Dan Pepper
  • Dave Michels
  • Dave Roberts
  • Hutch Carpenter
  • Jacob Morgan
  • Jarret Pazahanick
  • Jason M. Lemkin
  • Jeffrey Vocell
  • Joel York
  • John Taschek
  • Krishnan Subramanian
  • Mark Fidelman
  • Mark Suster
  • Martijn Linssen
  • Michael Krigsman
  • Ofir Nachmani
  • Paul Miller
  • Quinton Wall
  • Rakesh Malhotra
  • Randy Bias
  • Sadagopan
  • Scott Bils
  • Zoli Erdos
Sponsored by: