In spite
of the cost advantages offered by SaaS, enterprise customers are still reluctant
to embrace this technology. Security and privacy are touted as biggest reasons
for such a reluctance. Enterprises gets edgy as soon as we talk about stuff
outside of their firewall. This lack of trust also shows up in the
infrastructure space and some companies have adopted private clouds as a short
term solution. Private clouds gives them a chance to have Cloud like
architecture inside of their firewall. Slowly SaaS vendors are also taking steps
to deliver the software as a service inside the enterprise firewall. Enterprises
are warming up to this trend because it helps them cut costs while still keeping
the critical data inside of their firewall.
Longjump, a PaaS
provider, announced on Tuesday that their Longjump Business Applications
Platform can now be licensed to be installed at the enterprise data centers or
by ISVs in their own choice of datacenters. Their platform is available in three
deployment configurations fitting the needs of variety of businesses.
- Multi-Tenant – Suitable for large scale enterprises who want to host the
software and data of different business units/departments - Single-Tenant – Ideal for enterprises wanting to host SaaS applications
inside their firewall - On-Demand – Suitable for small businesses who don’t want to invest huge
amounts on infrastructure
Enterprises will love such an option because it gives them an opportunity to
cut costs drastically in the current economic climate and, also, offers them the
same privacy and security comfort level from their on-premise mindset. This will
also help them deal with regulatory and compliance issues without much
trouble.
Let us be very clear here. It is going to take some time before enterprises
get comfortable with SaaS in its current form. Instead of trying to convince
enterprise customers to take a giant leap of faith, SaaS vendors can offer
options to install SaaS applications inside the enterprise firewall, either in the form of
an appliance or as an installable package. This will help enterprises embrace SaaS
in their workflow and, eventually, be comfortable with the idea of public cloud
or SaaS delivered from outside the firewall.
What do you think? Does it make sense to take this approach or it is a
pointless exercise without any substantial advantage. Feel free to add your
comments on this topic.






It’s interesting that, in the measurement of the whole cloud computing market — which is either a) huge, or b) huger, depending on whom you believe — that private clouds are not being included. I’ve seen that in the reccent Gartner forecast, and the same was done in a major academic white paper (the UC Berkeley RAD Lab paper from Feb ’09). “Private clouds” are being treated as a separate industry, it seems — or maybe that’s just because they will be very hard for anyone to quantify.
regards,
Graeme
http://www.twitter.com/graemethickins
Graeme, quantification is definitely an issue and a big chunk of purists still don’t want to associate “private clouds” within Cloud Computing because it is not a service tapped from a third party vendor. If one is going to still spend huge amounts of money on the infrastructure, it takes away one of the biggest benefits of cloud computing.
Krish,
I see this as very similar to what we discussed last week.
Private clouds are a great compromise for corporates. When you couple the private service with the private network, then you get the opportunity for true end to end SLA’s to materialise.
IMHO PaaS as a private cloud is a stretch, If i was a corporate i would want it either more vanilla (IaaS) so i can get the same as what i have now with the scale benefits or i would want the complete deal (SaaS) delivered to me.
Cheers Paul
Paul, I do agree with the possibility that PaaS as Private Clouds are a stretch. Since, I don’t have any idea about how exactly it is implemented, I am reserving my opinion on that. Hopefully, I get to see one such implementation before I make up my mind.