I was hanging out the other day with my buddy Jody Sherman, founder & CEO of EcoMom. I was an angel investor in his company, made a bunch of calls on his behalf and then I personally sent it out on AngelList. Through this process he raised $2 million.
When I described to people why I initially invested my calls went something like this, “He’s taken kicks to the face for nearly 2 years and is still standing. I know this guy is a money maker. I just had to line up behind him. That, plus I love the space of high-customer-service, focused eCommerce for moms worried about what their kids eat & wear.”
I found this out through my own experience as a father with two kids. I would say my wife & I are on the “non paranoid” side of parents. Still, my wife had seen a report that almost all sun blocks for kids had a chemical known to be dangerous to kids. She did a bunch of research on it and finally found a small number of safe brands. Because my wife is a superstar she published them all on a blog here along with much other wonderful type-A mom advice.
But life would have been much easier if we could have just gone to EcoMom and let them do the vetting for us.
Anyway, I was with Jody last week and was lamenting the whole AngelListGate controversy. I was saying that I was happy it was all out in the open because I felt at least everybody could now understand the issues & opportunities from the perspectives of angels, entrepreneurs and VCs. I was sick of hyperbole articles pronouncing that VCs were “scared or AngelList” or “it was disrupting VC” or some other BS exaggeration like that.
Let’s be clear: AngelList doesn’t scare a single VC I know. It is additive. It is a communication platform. It’s awesome. But it’s not cutting VCs out. That’s dumb, exaggerated or just ill informed.
Jody & I had been through AngelList together. If I’m not mistaken I may have been the first person to send out an angel intro on AngelList through their new platform when it launched or at least I was one of the first few. It worked like a charm. But before I sent it I had made 10 private phone calls, sent emails & built support.
We had a great private chat last week in my office about “how to be effective when using AngelList.” Jody didn’t exactly have an easy time fund raising because he’s not the prototypical Silicon Valley funded entrepreneurs. He was raising money initially in the worst market in a decade (we met in 2008), he’s in his mid-40′s, is doing a mom’s site (he has no kids) and he has a JewFro. We talk about all of this in the video
We then started talking about Dave McClure. He had just written another one of his way-over-the-top blog posts. I was saying that he’s such a great champion of entrepreneurs who all love him but I didn’t know why he felt the need to always stick VCs in the eye (on blogs and Tweets). I think Dave has blogging Tourettes Syndrome when he hears the word VC.
I’ve known Dave for years, long before he or I were VCs. I know him to be a thoughtful, kind, hard-working if not irreverent guy. At first I was cynical about his ability to have 500 startups (or some fraction of that which is still larger than any VC has). I think how hard it is for me to be hands-on with a handful of portfolio companies.
I started to realize that Dave is able to do it because he approaches VC differently. He has set up an office, a process & people around him that are helpful to entrepreneurs in need of hands-on skills in a mass service way. I am impressed with his approach. I still think it’s best served when partnered with a more focused, hands-on VC who brings different things to the table – like more ability to write larger checks in a downturn, for one or solving a deep crisis that involves super hands-on involvement. I’ve had to do this with 2 companies at the same time. You can’t do it with 100.
So I wrote in my blog post about AngelList that I thought Dave was great and combined with a hands-on investor would be doubly awesome. He took this as a “back-handed compliment.” Not intended that way, it was sincere.
Anyway, Jody privately went on-and-on about how great Dave’s new 500Startups office & process is. He was talking profusely about their portfolio company email lists and the knowledge that is shared. See, Jody not only raised money on AngelList – he also raised it from Dave McClure.
So I thought, WTF? Might as well cut off our conversation and just restart it 48 hours later on camera. I sent out a teaser Tweet without releasing his name.
Then I saw this post from Nivi at AngelList so I thought I would invite he & Naval on to the show to talk about how AngelList works.
Had I planned any of this intentionally I would have invited Bryce Roberts on to give you “both sides of the argument” but the show came together fortuitously rather than planned. I hope that I at least defended Bryce’s point-of-view in the video (and in my previous post).
Oh, and of course I shoot all of my videos at the ThisWeekIn studios which are located in the Mahalo offices. So Jason swung by and crashed the show. Unsurprisingly I struggled to get a word in edgewise after that! But he added some good humor, spice and, yes, controversy to the close of the show.
That said, a summary below is available for those who prefer to read the notes version. A very big thank you to Travis Biziorek of Kibin who did the summary notes below. Kibin is a peer review site for essays, resumes, cover letters, etc. I love the concept. If you value the summary notes please at least check out the Kibin website & see what they do. I appreciate it.
*************** Show Notes ******************
How Jody Started EcoMom, its Evolution, Fundraising Process, and Utilization of AngelList [Minutes: Start – 23:00]The Humble Beginnings as SproutBaby
EcoMom originally started as SproutBaby. It was created to provide peace of mind to moms looking for safe, healthy products for their kids. Jody self-funded the company and worked from his spare bedroom in February 2009. His passion stemmed from what he saw moms doing. He noticed their extremely social tendencies and the potential of a very large market.
A Quick Look at Jody’s Previous Success
- Left Silicon Graphics to become the 16th employee of Lycos
- Helped get the first security to ever be sold over the internet with a credit card
- Helped acquire BuyDirect from CNET – later sold to Beyond.Com
- Started MightyMail and sold to Zoom.Com which later merged with NBC
- Co-founded a company in the private jet business – sold to Virgin America
The Evolution of SproutBaby to EcoMom
Starting with exclusive rights to sell celebrity chef, Tyler Florence’s, line of baby food online, SproutBaby began seeing initial traction from customer interest as physical distribution spread. As the company began to grow, brand confusion became an undeniable issue. I had also expressed my concern for SproutBaby’s lack of independence from their partner with Jody.
The partners soon outgrew each other and SproutBaby acquired EcoMom, ultimately going through a complete brand shift. They dropped their number one selling product and switched to a competitor’s product while managing not to lose a single sale. EcoMom’s metrics improved throughout this process and that’s when I decided to invest.
EcoMom Makes a Breakthrough in its Search for Funding
Jody initially struggled with landing funding for EcoMom, but had now proven he would be successful and asked for some introductions. Jody soon met with Dave McClure who ended up immediately writing a check as a placeholder investment and offering help to get EcoMom press coverage.
Paige Craig initially showed absolutely no investment interest but agreed to meet Jody and ended up investing. These introductions led to Cyan & Scott Banister who also became investors along with many other angel introductions. It soon became difficult to manage the many new investment leads.
EcoMom’s Initial Exposure on AngelList and the Results
Tom McInerney and I were the first to speak with Nivi about getting EcoMom on AngelList. Cyan pushed EcoMom out to AngeLlist once more, giving them even more credibility. Jody credits AngelList for getting his round done and credits Zao Yang, Paige Craig and me as the three people most responsible for its success (although he clearly states he can tie $1 million in funded just to Zao).
He stresses the importance of his initial legwork getting his “champions” on board before going to AngelList and feels this is a crucial first step for any startup.
Other Important Discussions in this Section you Shouldn’t Miss:
II. Part 2/3 of Interview:
AngelList: A Quick Introduction and Interview with Founders Babak Nivi & Naval Ravikant – [Minutes: 23:00 – 55:00]
My Personal Take on AngelList
I believe AngelList is capable of managing deal flow by acting as a filter. I personally like meeting teams very early on and wish I could get more proprietary deal flow from it. My personal concern is for that of the inexperienced angel. I’m not saying people shouldn’t be angels, I’m just suggesting they be careful in relying too heavily on “social proof” without having personal experience in a category, knowing the founders or having domain / product knowledge.
Bryce publicly blogged about his decision to delete his AngelList profile and Jason responded in what I called a “bullying” post. While Jason’s post had some merit, he could have handled it better and that’s why I decided to weigh in. I personally prefer debating the merits of one’s logical arguments rather than character assaults.
Q&A with Babak Nivi and Naval Ravikant, founders of AngelList
AngelList’s goal is to get good companies funded. There is no secret, just a lot of hard work and screening of both startups and investors. All investors must be accredited with a couple of deals already under their belt. Investor acceptance is on a case-by-case basis and they have kicked people out of the community.
When asked about disclosure concerns, Nivi and Naval made it clear that any prior investments by them are always disclosed up-front. They have a strict policy of sharing all deals that come into AngelList. Nothing is kept or cherry picked by them for their own gain.
Nivi and Naval say that social proof is just one element that makes for a strong AngelList profile. The ability to show traction is actually the most important piece of information on profiles. Startups should take ample time on their profiles, as it will be shown to thousands of investors.
Nivi and Naval are focused on expanding AngelList’s reach. While they currently allow international funding opportunities, the bar is set at a different level. However, three months from now there may be more flexibility with international investments. They see AngelList as flattening and fattening the funding environment by giving more access to more deals and more investors.
Other Nuggets in this Section you won’t want to Miss:
- I ask Jody what makes EcoMom an exciting company
- Jody talks about what it’s like working with Dave McClure
- I accidently blow the cover of a hot startup raising a round of financing on AngelList (oops!) – hint – it’s a product that I talk very openly about loving but I’m not an investor
III. Part 3/3 of Interview:
Jason Calacanis Crashes the Party and Chimes in on the AngelList Debate – [Minutes: 55:00 – End]
Jason Calacanis Crashes the Party to Solidify his Stance Regarding AngelList
Jason makes it clear that he felt Bryce Roberts’ recent blog post about deleting his profile on AngelList was classic grandstanding. [I remind Jason he did the same thing when he left Facebook] He argues that AngelList has brought new angels into the market and gotten them excited. There is suddenly more access to what used to be privileged deals.
Jason asks what the role of a boutique seed investor will be going forward – he thinks they will become irrelevant. I completely disagree. I argue there is simply no substitute for experienced investors. These new angels haven’t seen good and bad markets; they might not be able to stand by entrepreneurs in the bad times.
I ask Naval about the concern of rising valuations and if he sees this as a potential issue with AngelList. Naval says valuations are definitely going up, but isn’t completely sure why. It could be a bubble or better balance of supply and demand. He continues to explain how today’s seed round has replaced the series A of yesterday. This is also a cause for increased valuations.
I argue the opposite. It’s definitely true that it takes much less money to start a company today than it did when I was starting my first company. Servers and other infrastructure expenses are a fraction of what they used to be. But what this is really doing is allowing companies to be created that couldn’t be created ten years ago. With more companies and more investors capable of funding them, VCs are simply given a larger pool of deals to select from.
I ask Naval about the importance of a lead investor. My opinion is that it’s very important to raise money from someone who is helpful and reputable and is willing to bring in the same types of investors. What if nobody stands up as a lead investor? Is this a potential issue with AngelList? Naval agrees that lead investors of these type are important.
Nivi & Naval Share some of their Future Plans for AngelList
Nivi and Naval are 100% committed to AngelList right now. Jason asks what the end game is, but Naval claims they don’t really have one in mind. At the very least, Nivi and Naval see AngelList as a tool to find good investments and help startups. But they aren’t currently interested in making investments. AngelList has really been an offshoot of VentureHacks.
They don’t see any reason to tax startups and consider it as more of a CraigsList type listing service. Some of their goals are to incorporate better matching and filtering for investors. Naval expresses the need to empower the community with more social voting in order to spread the work load of reviewing startups. He doesn’t have much interest in creating forums since there are already several out there.
To conclude, I note that we’re all in the same ecosystem (angels, seed, VC, growth equity, IPOs) and should view each other as collaborative even though we sometimes compete. AngelList has introduced new competition and competition in any industry is always good.
(Cross-posted @ Both Sides of the Table)