There is much confusion on how to use the Twitter @ sign – even amongst daily Twitter users. So as part of my ongoing series Twitter Insights, I wanted to cover how the @ actually works (even experienced users may be surprised by some of the points)
The basics:
1. When you use the @username (e.g. @msuster for me) the message you write appears in my @msuster inbox on Twitter.com and on any of the desktop or mobile clients. Great.
2. This is a good way to call something out to my attention since it is narrower than just broadcasting hoping that I might see the message
3. It is also a sign of attribution when you retweet a message by another user (e.g. RT @msuster). People also use it in other obvious ways including suggesting users to follow such as #FollowFriday @msuster
4. You can send an @ message to anybody – whether or not they follow you. You can only “d” people (direct message) who follow you.
5. I am currently not overwhelmed with people who @ message me so I read all of mine. Usually in a timely manner. But if the person you @ has tons of followers (think Robert Scoble, Michael Arrington or any celebrities who use Twitter) don’t assume they’ll see your messages
More advanced:
1. This is important … If you send somebody a message and you START it with an @name then the only people who will see your message are people who follow you and people who follow the person you replied to. Most people don’t seem to know this. For example, if you follow me but not @deblanda an I send her a message starting with an @ then you won’t see it at all. Anyone who follows both of us will see the message. If you precede the message by anything, even a dash and a space like, “- @deblanda nice to see you” then everybody will see it.
When does this come into play? Sometimes I’ll see people who want to make people aware of a blog posting. They’ll say [email protected] provides great insight into VC valuation discussions – see http://bit.ly/C5t6O” . They might have 2,000 followers. I have 1,200. Only the small subset who follow both of us, say 100, will see the message.
So if you’re really responding to somebody and you don’t want all your followers to see it (but you don’t necessarily want to send a private message via DM or you can’t because they don’t follow you) then start with an @. Otherwise make sure it has text in front of it.
2. Equally important to know … If you reply to a message as above and therefore assume that only a small subset of followers will see the message – you need to be aware that anybody can proactively look at the message by clicking on your Twitter name and seeing all of your posts. If you truly want it to be private stick to DM or email (or better yet … telephone!)
Did I miss any idiosyncracies? Make sure to add them to the comments.
(Cross-posted @ Both Sides of the Table)
Your post reminded me about a feature that I thought Twitter had implemented but having just tested it, I don’t think they have:
http://blog.twitter.com/2009/05/we-learned-lot.html
The idea was that if you clicked a reply button, only followers of the person could see the reply, but if you typed @username, then everyone following you could see it. I like this approach and it saves prefixing replies with dots and dashes and whatever.
Mark,
This goes way beyond Twitter 101, we’re talking Master’s or Doctorate level here:-)
I think you have a contradiction. You say:
> 1. …If you send somebody a message and you
> START it with an @name then the only people who
> will see your message are people who follow you
> and people who follow the person you replied to.
Then you say:
> …if you follow me but not @deblanda
> and I send her a message starting with an @
> then you won’t see it at all.
But you just said I’d see it because you sent it and I follow you.
> Anyone who follows both of us will see the message.
Ah, so in 1., I think you meant that only people who follow *both* you *and* the recipient will see it. Now it fits. No further questions. (Glad to hear that?)
Thanks,
TW
Livecut / TW,
You figured it out. In the more advanced, point 1 I said that if you follow both the sender and receiver you will see the message. Operative word there is “both” and not “either.” I’m sure it would have been more clear if I would have emphasized the boolean AND, but at least with your commentary and this not hopefully no one else will be confused. Thanks for your comment.